Intergroup discrimination and selfesteem in the minimal group paradigm louise lemyre and philip m. Tajfel to demonstrate the minimal group paradigm used in social identity theory. Consequences of minimal group affiliations in children. Studying the effects of status in an interactive minimal. For example, much work has demonstrated the power of the minimal group paradigm a research method to determine the minimal conditions needed for discriminatory behavior to promote an ingroup. Minimal group paradigm definition the minimal group paradigm is a procedure that researchers use to create new social groups in the laboratory. Results indicated that participants with a high proportion of autistic traits showed less ingroup favouritism, and that this was due to a decreased tendency for selfcategorization. One of the most influential paradigms in research on intergroup relations is the minimal group paradigm. From the start, most au thors approached the problem on a kinematic level, i. For example, much work has demonstrated the power of the minimal group paradigm a research method to determine the minimal conditions needed for discriminatory behavior to promote an in group. Conversation logic effects in the minimal group paradigm. Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in. Tajfel matrices, has subjects distribute money to ingroup and outgroup. Although it may be used for a variety of purposes, it is most well known as a method for investigating the minimal conditions required for discrimination to occur between groups.
The minimal group paradigm have received widespread attention and stimulated has been greatly influential in the area of inter recent theoretical developments of intergroup rela group relations particularly in its formulation of tions and prejudice cf. There is a unique monic polynomial m ax of minimal degree such that m aa 0. On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal. Intergroup discrimination and selfesteem in the minimal. The minimal group paradigm this activity replicates, more or less, the exact experiment used by henri tajfel to demonstrate the minimal group paradigm used in social identity theory. We designed the present experiment to test the hypothesis that ms would intensify intergroup bias in minimal. The minimal polynomial of ais the least common multiple of all the elementary divisors.
Intergroup discrimination and selfesteem in the minimal group. Ingroup bias found in the minimal group paradigm is an important finding for. The minimal group paradigm is widely used in social psychology to study the most basic. Using the minimal group paradigm, 94 undergraduates were randomly. Tajfel matrices were used to provide a variety of options for point allocation and the choices made by participants were thus the key measure of ingroup. Knowing the minimal polynomial of a matrix often leaves only a few possibilities for the elementary divisors. The minimal group paradigm mgp is a popular method of testing intergroup. Minimal group procedures 3 an improved and deceptionfree minimal group induction procedure many years ago, a laboratory experiment produced curious findings.
The bottom row referred to amounts available for allocation to another member of the ingroup. The effects of mortality salience on intergroup bias. For example, the classic procedure involves asking participants to rate paintings made by two artists. Discrimination in the minimal group paradigm 79 44 36 34 34 36 44 30 47 22 42 table 1 ingroup and outgroup outcomes as a function of the multiple alternative matrices allocation strategy max max max max rel max joint min joint max rel recipient own own own dif other other other ingroup 42 47 outgroup 22 30 note. The minimal group paradigm and its maximal impact in research on social categorization. Minimal group paradigm definition psychology glossary. That is, the minimal group treatment can uncover individual tendencies. Intergroup behavior has long been studied within and among various societies. In one condition the top row of the matrices represented the amounts that could be allocated to a fellow group member. Controversy regarding the tajfel matrices prompted the creation of an alternative.
This paradigm, where a number of assumptions, concepts, values or practices were accepted in order to better allow a view of reality in relation to the onset of human group. The minimal group paradigm has been used in various study fields otten, 2016, and was first presented by tajfel and colleagues 1970tajfel and colleagues, 1971tajfel and colleagues, 1974. Contrary to most other research conducted in the minimal group paradigm tradition, bornstein, crum, wittenbraker, harring, insko and thibaut 1983a found little evidence of ingroup favoritism when they employed a revised measurement system i. Initial evidence for this was provided when yamagishi et al. However, research has also shown that conflicts of interests and selfinterest motives may not even be necessary for ingroup bias to occur. The goal is to categorize individuals into groups based on minimal criteria that are relatively trivial or arbitrary. There is a need therefore to revisit these studies in an environment that captures the interactive nature of groups and illuminates the diachronic processes involved in group formation and behaviour. The socalled minimal group studies show that people tend to favor their own group in terms of reward allocations even when they are categorized on a trivial basis e.
Study 1 employed the thinkaloud procedure in the minimal group paradigm mgp and concludes that social categorization is insufficient to cause social identity or intergroup discrimination, and that no theoretical explanation of minimal group behaviour is adequate to explain the variety of strategies employed within that paradigm. Pdf social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. Chen and li 2009 use a minimal group paradigm and study average social preferences towards ingroup and outgroup members. Like any good experimentalist, tajfel sought a flexible procedure within which to manipulate features thought to relate to the formation of intergroup bias. Ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm shown by. In the nongroup control, subjects allocate income to themselves and to a random participant in the experiment. Students receive a handout with matrices listing different values that their side of the auditorium the ingroup would. The minimal group paradigm developed by tajfel and associates e. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations pp. Psychology with shahroze suzuki recommended for you.
A participant was not allowed to award money to himself. The pauli group performing this action is in general a ddit but is a 2qutrit 2qt for the group 120,5 sl2,5 2i, a. Maximum joint profit and giving the largest reward to the ingroup would both be achieved by choosing the last pair in the row, giving 19 to a member of your own group, and 25 to a member of the other group. Predictions from the bounded and unbounded reciprocity hypotheses and from social identity theory sit were examined in a minimal group experiment in which ingroup outcome dependence, outgroup outcome dependence, and the strength of social identity were orthogonally manipulated. The tajfel matrices have been criticized for confounding the different allocation strategies brewer. Minimal group procedures 5 illuminating the advantages and disadvantages of the matrices e. Using the minimal group paradigm, in which participants are assigned to groups with anonymous others and asked to allocate resources to ingroup or. Minimal group research began when henri tajfel sought to develop a basic paradigm within which to study the origins of intergroup bias tajfel, 19712001. Smith university of british columbia, vancouver, canada this experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm is related to selfesteem. In this condition, participants were informed that their behaviour on the matrices could affect how subsequent positive and negative tasks would be allocated. The minimal group paradigm is a methodology employed in social psychology. Article pdf available in personality and social psychology bulletin 2212. Are people predisposed to favor their own groups at the expense of others, even. The minimal group paradigm and its minimal psychology.
Although this makes sense in the context of intergroup comparisons, selfesteem may, of course, be affected in other ways. Minimal group paradigm is a social psychology research methodology that proposes that the minimal condition for group biases like favoritism towards your own group and prejudice towards other groups is simply being a member of a group. Tajfel experiments 1970 harry potter edition duration. This article details a registered report for a wellpowered n 1500 experiment examining the influence of wealth inequality between groups on ingroup bias, as well as the potential moderating role of justification for the wealth distribution. In a typical minimal group paradigm experiment, participants are randomly allocated to a group and then asked to concurrently distribute resources to ingroup and outgroup members on allocation matrices specifically designed to measure allocation strategies that favor the ingroup and. The numbers in the matrices shown below represent units of 110 of a penny. The present study combines both methods, where the minimal group treatment serves as a control for the political group treatment. If px is any polynomial satisfying pa 0, then pis divisible by m a as a.
Minimal group paradigm study experiments henri tajfel. Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. Students receive a handout with matrices listing different values that their side of the auditorium the ingroup would receive and that the other side the out. That is, they will assume that this piece of information is relevant for the current topic of the experimentinteraction in this case, working on the matrices. Categorization versus noncategorization x matrix task. The initial minimal group paradigm mgp experiments billig. Using the classic minimal group paradigm, participants were randomly assigned to minimal groups before completing the task to allocate points to one of their fellow in or outgroup members. Initially motivated by an interest in understanding the basic determinants of social discrimination, this paradigm investigates the impact of social categorization on intergroup relations in the absence of realistic conflicts of interests, and for social categories that are arbitrary and novel. In the minimal group treatment, subjects are divided into two groups according to answers to a questionnaire on preferences for lines of poetry, paintings, and. The three additional states are referred to as colortriplet higgs scalars.
Outgroup accountability in the minimal group paradigm citeseerx. Pdf the minimal group paradigm and the tajfel matricesfundamental orientations in resource allocationspsychological and. Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. The paradigm was set up to challenge the notion of intergroup conflict or ingroup favouritism and discover the minimal conditions for intergroup behaviour, that is, those conditions which are both necessary and sufficient for a collection of individuals to be ethnocentric i.
Based on this premise, we investigated whether ingroup favouritism within the minimal group paradigm is reduced to the extent that individuals possess autistic traits. Generate ordered matrices, each of which should consist of 14 boxes containing two numbers. The variables in these studies have been derived from conflict, competition, cooperation, personal interaction, structures, personalities, etc. Pdf social identity theory sit proposes that discrimination reflects competition. Website software copyright 2019, archieboy holdings, llc. However, to maximise your own rewards while also maximising the difference, you might well choose one of the middle boxes and give 12 to a member of your own group and 11 to a member of.
220 1478 780 512 1183 721 1526 984 1200 1300 81 1036 125 287 597 233 94 713 1630 216 360 711 1052 824 495 1022 1468 578 234 1150 707 536 910 1085 1444 722 1107 683